<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Like Dreamhost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simianlogicstudios.com/2008/01/15/why-i-like-dreamhost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simianlogicstudios.com/2008/01/15/why-i-like-dreamhost/</link>
	<description>indie game developer, web tinkerer, and transplanted Southerner living in Silicon Valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:52:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.simianlogicstudios.com/2008/01/15/why-i-like-dreamhost/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simianlogic3d.com/blog/2008/01/15/why-i-like-dreamhost/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>DreamHost isn&#039;t bad but they oversell like crazy (600 users on a box anyone?), which means that the load on their servers tend to be quite high. I&#039;ve seen the load on mine go as high as 80!
Lately I&#039;ve given WebFaction a try and I have to say I&#039;m impressed. It looks like they put far fewer users on each box (on mine there&#039;s currently 113) and the load is consistently below 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DreamHost isn&#8217;t bad but they oversell like crazy (600 users on a box anyone?), which means that the load on their servers tend to be quite high. I&#8217;ve seen the load on mine go as high as 80!<br />
Lately I&#8217;ve given WebFaction a try and I have to say I&#8217;m impressed. It looks like they put far fewer users on each box (on mine there&#8217;s currently 113) and the load is consistently below 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
